" requests for judicial notice are simply trying to squirm out from the lawsuit."

letgo...wasn't RIM one of the recent three defendants that had their retail co-defendants released?

defendants filed their motion... Per e.Digitals responce:

filed by Defendants Research In Motion Limited dba BlackBerry and Research In Motion Corporation dba BlackBerry on or about July 26, 2013 in redacted form and under seal.

=================================================

letgo recent: Judge gives order....three days later...

e.Digital Corporation v. Research in Motion - Update

07/29/2013 57 ORDER Re: Oral Argument. Pending before the Court in this patent infringement action is Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, The motion is set for hearing on Friday, August 2, 2013, and is suitable for submission without oral argument pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1). Accordingly, no appearances are required at this time. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 7/29/2013.(aef) (Entered: 07/29/2013)

=======================================

Smans recent: e.Digital response

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant e.Digital Corporation (“Plaintiff” or “e.Digital”) submits the following objections to the “Request for Judicial Notice In Support of Defendants’

Silver, I'd say yes, Handal is very much on top....total window time... July 26, 2013 to August 2, .

doni