How do I read that ....

The subpoena was ordered June 19th, or e.Digital submitted the redacted information on June 19th?

I miss read that, it wasn't the first judge that ordered it, it was the current judge...

He had to put into speculation of the defendants to allow it to happen.

I'm amazed that documents of this nature can be so easily open...even if they are redacted.

All it takes is the speculated word of a defendant to state "we need to open this private information your honor"..."so be it, I believe your speculation".

If not that scenario, how else can it be?

Anyway, I guess I've had enough of the insider bullsh**

doni