Re: I note that...
in response to
by
posted on
Aug 02, 2013 09:00PM
The last three docket reports of e.Digital Corporation v. Osram Sylvania, Inc. et al
07/23/2013 | 47 | ORDER Re: Oral Argument. Pending before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Apply Collateral Estoppel, which is set for hearing on July 26, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. Defendants in the above-captioned cases shall jointly designate one attorney to argue the motion on their behalf. Counsel may appear telephonically or in person. No later than 4:00 p.m. Thursday, July 25, 2013, the parties shall jointly submit a list of counsel who will be appearing telephonically, and identify the case number and party for which each counsel will be appearing. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 7/23/2013.(aef) (Entered: 07/24/2013) |
07/24/2013 | 48 | NOTICE of Settlement by e.Digital Corporation (Chalk, Pamela) (aef). (Entered: 07/24/2013) |
07/26/2013 | 49 | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Dana M. Sabraw: Motion Hearing held on 7/26/2013 re 36 MOTION to Apply Collateral Estoppel to Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation filed by Osram Sylvania, Inc., Curtis International Ltd. (Court Reporter/ECR Lee Ann Pence). (Plaintiff Attorney Anton N Handal, Gabriel G Hedrick, Pamela Chalk). (Defendant Attorney not appearing by agreement of the parties). (no document attached) (jak) (Entered: 07/26/2013) |
Doc 48 shows settlement...however, the last doc indicates that they motioned to apply CE along with Curtis International Ltd....
"(Court Reporter/ECR Lee Ann Pence). (Plaintiff Attorney Anton N Handal, Gabriel G Hedrick, Pamela Chalk). (Defendant Attorney not appearing by agreement of the parties). (no document attached)"
?
doni