Free
Message: Re: so there
9
Aug 22, 2013 02:14PM

Mr Plankton,

Thank You!

A Very Positive Post reflecting the Absolute Confidence from our Management who appear to have options that we may not have considered. Handel & Co have done an Excellent Job for us shareholders and OUR Company E.Digital. HOWEVER... I started thinking about our previous law firm and the one fact that I never liked..... They also represented APPLE.

I'm sure most people witnessed the shifting of judges that occurred the minute the action was filed that included Apple. I'm sure all of us remember the action which occurred in the last month that OVER RULED the ITC in the matter of Samsung vs Apple. This is where the ruling by the ITC expected on a Friday never came ONLY to be over ruled by The President of The United States on SUNDAY EVENING. This prevented Samsung , who had won an injunction aganst Apple, from having it enforced. A ruling from the ITC has never been issued ( I'm not aware of one).

So back to our previous attornies, As I think of all the things that have happend since they were hired on a contigency basis( this was a trap), I think it is possible that this was a Set-Up from the get-go. The planning that goes into STRATAGEM, used by companies to deceive and destroy their enemy, could be years in the making. Its possible that this is the result of todays ruling which has to have included participation BY the JUDGE.

QUESTION:

WHAT do you think apple gave to the judge that he would be able to HOLD ON to?

WHAT do you think apple gave to the judge that could CONVINCE HIM that apple was entitled to use C/E in this case after the judge asked several times but no rational answer was given.

LIARS, THEIVES, S...BAGS

4
Aug 22, 2013 03:18PM
4
Aug 22, 2013 03:35PM
4
Aug 22, 2013 03:45PM
3
Aug 22, 2013 03:48PM
12
Aug 22, 2013 04:23PM
2
Aug 22, 2013 04:44PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply