MINUTES OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
e.DIGITAL v. PANTECH No. 13-0023-DMS(WVG)
HON. WILLIAM V. GALLO CT. DEPUTY J. YAHL RPTR. 1.5 H
Attorneys
Plaintiffs Defendants
ANTON HANDAL JAMES PAK
PAMELA CHALK
ENE held.
On or before September 16, 2013, counsel for Defendants shall meet and
confer with the other counsel for the Defendants in all the e.Digital
cases pending in this district regarding serving a single request for
production of documents on Plaintiff for settlement agreements in
e.Digital v. Pentax, 09cv2578-MSK(MJW)(D. Col.). If counsel for any
Defendant other than Pantech opposes this procedure, Defendant’s counsel
is to notify, and meet and confer with, Plaintiff’s counsel to discuss an
alternative procedure as to the opposing Defendants. Plaintiff’s and
Defendants’ counsel may notify the Court if necessary.
On or before September 16, 2013, counsel for Defendants shall serve a
single request for production of documents on Plaintiff for settlement
agreements in e.Digital v. Pentax.
On or before October 7, 2013, Plaintiff shall give notice to the
Defendants who entered into settlement agreements in e.Digital v. Pentax
that the settlement agreements are sought by the Defendants in all the
e.Digital cases pending in this district.
On or before October 7, 2013, if there are no time parameters set forth in
the settlement agreements for the Defendants in e.Digital v. Pentax to
object to production of the settlement agreements to all counsel for the
Defendants in all the e.Digital cases pending in this district, the
Defendants in e.Digital v. Pentax shall approve, disapprove, or otherwise
act in connection with production of the settlement agreements.
On or before October 14, 2013, counsel for e.Digital shall produce to
counsel for Pantech the settlement agreements in e.Digital v. Pentax or
notify the Court that such production can not be made.
DATED: September 9, 2013
Hon. William V. Gallo
U.S. Magistrate Judge