Re: EDIG v. Philips -after the Parties’ dispute as to the ’737 and ’170 are resolved

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

doni

Rank: President [?]

Points: 76204 [?]

Votes: 138 Score: 3.3 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: EDIG v. Philips -after the Parties’ dispute as to the ’737 and ’170 are resolved

in response to

EDIG v. Philips -after the Parties’ dispute as to the ’737 and ’170 are resolved

sman998

posted on Oct 01, 2013 04:08PM

"1. In light of the Collateral Estoppel Order, the Parties agree that the Non-Final Stipulated Partial Judgment attached hereto as Exhibit “A” may be entered by the Court and/or incorporated into any final judgment of the Court in this matter. The Non-Final Stipulated Partial Judgment is not a final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b),"

========================================

Back to exhibit A...lol

　If settlements are not reached prior to　any final judgement...all bets are off and Exhibit "A" will be entered.

　any .....means just that...any.　The results of claims construction　can be dis-positive to e.Digital, or positive.

　If the results are positive....BLR....your previous thoughts would be considered.　