"8. Accordingly, the Court hereby enters this Final Judgment as follows: a) Judgment in favor of Huawei on e.Digital’s claims for infringement of claims 33 and 34 of the ’774 patent, claims 2 and 5 of the ’108 patent, and any other claims depending therefrom (Dkt# 1) as a result of the application of the Collateral Estoppel Order."

It's amazing how they are all dodging around us...and they are, I can feel it. I put the question out there I'd be looking for what was missing in the motion to settle.

With that final judgment....how is the 774 consideration of non infringement issue resolved for Huawei....with or without prejudice...???

This remains a big question, why did the judge not give the full relative obligation in this matter? lol

Also, this same issue was not outlined for Huawei as it was of other defendants... in the just recent and posted motion leading to this final judgment.

The court is being friendly to Handal in keeping it quiet.

IMO, the ruling, as it was kept quiet...is with prejudice regarding the 774 issue...otherwise, why would it not simply be revealed?

amazing stuff...

doni