Re: A good example of case law for EDIG -Judge denies motion for entry judgement-54b
posted on
Oct 23, 2013 01:15PM
It is my understanding that the whole point of allowing the collateral estoppel to stand is that, in spite of the re-exam, Edig was not allowed to re litigate the ruling made by the CO court. So why should Apple be allowed to re litigate the current already agreed upon items that they signed off on?