Free
Message: Re: A good example of case law for EDIG -Judge denies motion for entry judgement-54b
9
Oct 23, 2013 10:19AM
3
Oct 23, 2013 10:28AM
9
Oct 23, 2013 10:41AM
4
Oct 23, 2013 11:16AM
4
Oct 23, 2013 12:13PM

It is my understanding that the whole point of allowing the collateral estoppel to stand is that, in spite of the re-exam, Edig was not allowed to re litigate the ruling made by the CO court. So why should Apple be allowed to re litigate the current already agreed upon items that they signed off on?

5
Oct 23, 2013 01:44PM
1
Oct 23, 2013 03:58PM
4
Oct 23, 2013 04:06PM
6
Oct 23, 2013 04:13PM
24
Oct 23, 2013 08:28PM
4
Oct 23, 2013 08:36PM
6
Oct 23, 2013 08:40PM
2
Oct 23, 2013 08:59PM
5
Oct 23, 2013 09:53PM
4
Oct 23, 2013 09:57PM
1
Oct 25, 2013 09:42PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply