Thing is, if Apple is stating they want to appeal it on their own now....why did they not do that after they got their motion for CE approved by the court? And if they did, I'm sure they would have given their strategy to e.Digital....lol.

Was it, because they really do not want to go there, we are not that horrible to our opponents? NOT!!!

108 is not part of Apples infringement actions...it is, however, part of the Huawei infringement actions and that is what Apple fears. Their stating Huawei is not acting in Apples best interest with regard to the appeal is bullshit, along with all the other comments of that nature.

108, a patent written in the same form as 774, spells the RAM issue out explicitly, where prior to the 774 re-exam is does not spell out explicitly, but implicitly considers the use of RAM to one skilled in the art. 774 after re-exam is now explicit regarding RAM and to one skilled in the art....and Apple fears this will be conveyed to the appeals court.

doni