"It is my understanding the defendants wish to change their previous agreements in order to cause postponement of the CE appeal."

It's mine, that the change through 54b will allow defendants to proceed immediately to an appeals process without having a final judgment on 774 as stipulated in the stipulated partial judgements.

They want to by pass what was cast between parties and ruled by the judge.

IMO, It's a horse race to the appeal process...and e.Digital needs its appeal ruled on first for 774 and 108....Is this race confusing the appeals court, or will it follow normal procedure with the blinders on(as a non issue) regarding the civil court proceedings?

doni