Free
Message: Re: Detailed objection of Handal- e.Digital Corporation v. Apple re 66 pacer

Found this and it give me a big smile -

e.Digital vs. Apple Inc. - US Patent: 5,742,737 - “Method For Recording Voice Messages On Flash Memory In A Hand Held Recorder,”

''The accused products for purposes of the ‘737 patent include but are not limited to the Apple iPhone, iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4, iPhone 4S, and iPhone 5 mobile devices; the Apple iPad series of tablets (excluding the first generation); the Apple iPad Mini series of tablets; the Apple iPod Nano series of devices (excluding the first generation); the Apple iPod Touch series of devices (excluding the first generation); the MacBook Pro series of computers; and the MacBook Air series of computers.
The accused products, alone or in combination with other products, practice each of the limitations of independent claim 1 and dependent claim 3 of the ‘737 patent; and independent claim 4 of the ‘737 patent. The MacBook accused products, with a slot for a flash memory
module, alone or in combination with other product also infringe each and every element of independent claims 9 and 13 and dependent claims 6 and 7 of the ‘737
patent.
''
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply