Free
Message: Re: Pacer : O’Shea(Apple) & Kohm(Woodman Labs ) wants no EDIG surreply !!!
9
Dec 11, 2013 03:00PM

Dec 11, 2013 03:44PM
3
Dec 11, 2013 03:47PM
1
Dec 11, 2013 04:34PM

Dec 12, 2013 09:30AM
6
Dec 12, 2013 10:56AM

"So O'Shea's altruistic suggestions for e.Digital can only be an argument for this Judge to consider so as to allow the amendments."

At the moment, my prospective, his current language ventured, is to see if he can convience the judge to get his (new?)matters admissible....before the Dec 20 date.

It seems, he is overly per-verbalizing before the Dec 20 date...

IMVHO, all the judge has to do, without the verbal, is look at the material exhibits and say this is no good here, or this is good here....for the material issues entered in Doc 66.

The drama is entertaing though...lol

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply