Re: Pacer: e.DIGITAL v. Toshiba - Defendant must answer on or before March 20, 2014
posted on
Jan 30, 2014 07:05PM
"Am i mistaken ?
Edig is appealling the CE ruling
Some defendants are appealling the partial judgements ??
2 different animals ?"
=========================================
e.Digital is appealing the CE ruling, initially, because of final judgment conditions of e.Digital vs Huawei
e.Digital is now appealing the partial judgment amendments that the judge just ruled on for the remaining defendants...With that e.Digital is also appealing the remaining appeals based on the amendments....as e.Digital initiated the subsequent appeals...What e.Digital would like regarding these appeals, that defendants not be allowed to appeal the CE because of conditions negotated in the partial judgments...that the judge amended..
e.Digital jumped all over the details before the defendants had time to blink. With that, the only appeal to follow is e.Digital vs Huawei, though it is important to get the appeal of the partial amendments turned around.
doni