Patent # 108 and Importance of two Microphone to reduce background noise
in response to
by
Message: Apple getting hacked
In April, 2, 2013 Handal press release, it was pointing to rich in technologies and teachings related
to patent # 108 with following paragraphs.
" Among these is the noise cancellation claims of the '108 patent, which, generally speaking, teach the use of two microphones in handheld devices to reduce background noise"
Now we look at the # 108 patent description. " The patent invention provides an improvement over the system
of the Norris et al . US 5,491,774 , which improvement appears to be limited to the incorporation of a second
microphone element utilized to cancel noise received at the first microphone element to provide better sound quality."
In February 12, 2014 Appeal document by Futurewei technology ( Huawei) you appreciate followings ;
" The 108 patent recites the identical " sole memory " limitation that is in the "774" patent , and which was construed by the Colorado court. In addition the 108 patent incorporates by reference the 774 patent disclosure , copies,of the first two figures from the 774 patent , and , as stated by the PTO examiner , embodies the same invention as the 774 patent with only improvement limited to a second microphone."
My own observation : Handal trying to point the importance of second microphone in patent # 108 for patent infringement basis. The defendant do not realizes each patent has its own identity and reference no matter if there was only minute differences ,that's the way USPTO acts and differentiate each patents.If you carefully read defendant paragraphs above, indeed you also appreciate they also admit the improvement of second microphone in bolded sentence. JMHO
20 Recommendations
Loading...
Loading...
New Message
Please
login
to post a reply