Pacer: EDIG v. Centon - Defendant must respond on or before March,20,2014
in response to
by
Message: so, you want a Nunchi update?
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
E.DIGITAL CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 13-cv-2894-H-BGS
ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE
MOTION TO EXTEND
DEFENDANT’S TIME TO
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE
RESPOND
[Doc. No. 11]
vs.
CENTON ELECTRONICS, INC.,
Defendant.
On December 5, 2013, Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation filed its complaint against
Defendant Centon Electronics, Inc. (Doc. No. 1.) On January 31, 2014, Plaintiff served
Defendant with the complaint. (Doc. No. 10 at 2.) On February 24, 2014, Plaintiff filed
an unopposed, ex parte motion to extend Defendant’s deadline to answer or otherwise
respond to the complaint. (Doc. No. 11.)
The Court, for good cause shown, grants the motion. Defendant must answer or
otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s complaint on or before
March 20, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: March 7, 2014
______________________________
MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14 Recommendations
Loading...
Loading...
New Message
Please
login
to post a reply