No wise cracks, but "Who says it never will?" doesn't hold the company to account for what they were doing while the patents were waiting for approval or since the patents have been approved. richardo is right when he points out that we should be seeing more written about our technology than we have. It doesn't cost that much to develop real and effective demonstrations or to paint a compelling picture for how our tech could be used and why it would be needed. It would also be appropriate to research tech by other companies and be able to contast ours to theirs. In other words, they need to SELL the technology. We're not seeing any proof that they are actually trying to do any of that. We're just supposed to trust that they are and frankly they don't have a track record that inspires that level of trust. Just look at where we are today.

So you hire someone to work for you... to complete some kind of task. It doesn't matter what the task is. And all you ever hear from this person is that they're working on it, or it's going to take more time, or it's really hard. How long do you give this person the benefit of the doubt before you demand to see what's been accomplished so far and then to hear their plan for how the rest of the work is going to be completed?

I know this isn't a perfect apples to apples example, but it describes exactly how I feel about EDIG at this point. It's time for them to produce something beyond a few sentances in a PR that serve only as continued excuses. If they really do have an actual plan, then let's hear about it. Then let's see them make real progress. What ever happened to "Get the word out"? (as if a four-word sentance even constitutes a plan)

- Sinkman