Free
Message: Had a Brainstorm last night -
Reply New Message
Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message
Breton A. Bocchieri (CA Bar No. 119459)
E-mail: Breton.bocchieri@novakdruce.com
Novak Druce Connolly Bove + Quigg LLP
333 South Grand Avenue, 23rd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: (213) 787-2500
Facsimile: (213) 687-0498
Christine Yang (CA Bar No. 102048)
E-mail: Cyang@sjclawpc.com
Victoria D. Hao (admitted pro hac vice)
(DC Bar No. 489555)
E-mail: vhao@sjclawpc.com
Martha J. Hopkins (admitted pro hac vice)
(WV Bar No. 11215)
E-mail: mhopkins@sjclawpc.com
Law Office of S.J. Christine Yang
17220 Newhope Street Suites 101-102
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Telephone: (714) 641-4022
Facsimile: (714) 641-2082
Attorneys for Defendant Kingston Technology Company, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
e.Digital Corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
Kingston Technology Company, Inc.,
Defendant.
Case No. 3:13-cv-2906-H-BGS
DEFENDANT KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.’S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION (DKT 17) AND REQUEST TO REMOVE THE ASSOCIATED HEARING DATE OF APRIL 21, 2014, 10:30 A.M.
Assigned to the Honorable
Judge Marilyn L. Huff
Courtroom 15A (Annex)
TO THE CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA:
Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(f), Defendant Kingston Technology
Company, Inc. (“Defendant”) hereby presents this notice to withdraw its motion to
dismiss filed on March 20, 2014 (Dkt #17) (the “Motion To Dismiss”) and to
removal of the associated hearing date of April 12, 2014, 10:30 AM.
On December 5, 2013, Plaintiff initiated the instant case.
On February 26, 2014, Plaintiff filed an ex parte motion for extension of
time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond Plaintiff’s original complaint
until March 28, 2014 (Dkt #15).
On March 10, 2014, the Court issued an order granting extension until
March 20, 2014 (Dkt #16).
On March 20, 2014, Defendant filed its Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s
Complaint dated December 5, 2013 for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Dkt #17).
In response to Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss, Plaintiff filed an Amended
Complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1) on March 21, 2014,
more than three months after its original complaint (Dkt. #18).
In view of Plaintiff’s filing of an amended complaint, Defendant hereby
withdraws its March 20, 2014 motion and respectfully requests that the associated
hearing date of April 12, 2014, 10:30 AM be removed from the Court’s calendar at
this time.
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3), Defendant will
answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, including filing a
motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint.
Dated: March 26, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
_/s/ Breton A. Bocchieri____
Breton A. Bocchieri
E-mail: Breton.bocchieri@novakdruce.com
Novak Druce Connolly Bove + Quigg LLP
333 South Grand Avenue, 23rd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: (213) 787-2500
Christine Yang
Victoria Hao (Pro Hac Vice)
Martha Hopkins (Pro Hac Vice)
Law Offices of S.J. Christine Yang
17220 Newhope Street, Suites 101 & 102
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Tel: (714) 641-4022
Fax: (714) 641-2082
cyang@sjclawpc.com
vhao@sjclawpc.com
mhopkins@sjclawpc.com
14 Recommendations
Reply New Message
Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply