So now you are back peddling. You used the words 'consider this as insider information"--both mean spirited and wrong--MAYBE or no that is how I interpreted the insuation--Joe, Drven and I have tried to share our interpretation of what we heard in an open forum, the stockholders meeting as others there have also tried to do. To the best of my knowlege, Fred is not providing any information on any individual basis. Since you have not seen it in writing, maybe you would like me to transcribe the next stockholders meeting for you and send it to you. Disagreeing is disagreeing, having differences of opinions(not facts) is having differences of opinions. In my book you owe Joe an apology.