Pacer : e.DIGITAL v. Intel
in response to
by
Message: There was no Apple "deal" !
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
E.DIGITAL CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 13-cv-2905-H-BGS
ORDER SUBMITTING
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO
DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S
FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT
[Doc. No. 18]
vs.
INTEL CORPORATION,
Defendant.
On March 19, 2014, Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation filed its First Amended
Complaint (“FAC”) against Defendant Intel Corporation. (Doc. No. 13.) On March
28, 2014, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s FAC. (Doc. No. 18.) Plaintiff
filed its opposition on April 14, 2014. (Doc. No. 22.) Defendant filed its reply on
April 21, 2014. (Doc. No. 23.) A hearing on Defendant’s motion is currently
scheduled for April 28, 2014 at 10:30 a.m.
The Court, pursuant to its discretion under Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1), concludes
that resolution of the motion does not require oral argument. The Court therefore
vacates the scheduled hearing and submits the motion on the parties’ papers
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 22, 2014
______________________________
MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18 Recommendations
Loading...
Loading...
New Message
Please
login
to post a reply