Free
Message: The message should be clear.

On the Nunchi front, lets look back a bit, then bring it to present tense.

  • 9-1-11 SHM, before the lead patent and 5 continuations were approved, we saw a brief introduction/presentation to include a video demo showing 2 smart phones interacting re: social media. They were very careful not to show much....the patent applications were still hidden from view on the USPTO website. Remember all the comments as to why they were cloaked...lol.
  • On Sunday morning July 22, 2012 I noticed "Introducing Nunchi" on the website, then posted it.
  • From Nov 6 thru Nov 20, 2012 the lead patent and 5 continuations were officially approved.
  • There are 3 continuations that we know of, which remain in the examination stage.
  • During the 8-29-13 SHM, we were advised of the "more than 50, less than 100, notified of the Nunchi Patent Portfolio, with many conducting DD." Based on the info shown per IPmetrics website, an NDA was required for interested parties to conduct DD, which to me means, members of the EDIG team were in discussions with these outfits.
  • PR's and SEC filings had statements and still do, right up to the 10-K and June 13, 2014 PR showing the INTENT to sell Nunchi licenses, and they will protect their IP.
  • The July 2 PR drove the message home...pay for a Nunchi license, but if you steal our IP, we'll see you in court.....in so many words that is.

So, the message is clear, efforts have been on going to obtain license agreements, yet the thieves are still out there.

There are those elsewhere that say, if the tech was worth anything, CE outfits would pay for a license, not steal the IP.

Let me see here....if a car thief can make a dishonest living, unless or until he gets caught, would he go to a dearlership and pay for a car, or steal one at the local mall, then rush to a chop shop to collect profits?

What kind of mentality is there to a rediculous conclusion that the IP is worthless? Where do these minds come up with this nonsense?

There is no question in MY mind, the company has made every effort within their capability, to SELL licenses, but they can't stop a thief, so they catch him and make him pay!

So, this makes EDIG a patent troll? So, this means our business model is going to court? So, this means the plan is only to line Handal & Assoc's pockets and pay EDIG salaries?

I can't think of a single CE company, but there probably are a few, that have not filed patent infringements suits...are they trolls?

OK, I got it off my chest!

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply