Free
Message: Re: EDIG v TOPRAM -Judge denied TOPRAM for transfer case to Northern California !

" It is not denied."

ORDERED that the ENE shall be continued to October 17, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. ENE
Statements and the joint discovery plan shall be submitted to chambers no later than
October 10, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 5, 2014
DAVID H. BARTICK
United States Magistrate Judge

Case remains in SC with a new ENE date, there appears to be no formal denial of defendants motion to move case.

The only issue we have to go on, as recognized by the court regarding transfer, is this...

“Second, the pendency of Defendant’s motion to transfer venue is insufficient .” (Note sentence ends with period)

“Even if that motion remains pending at the time of the scheduled ENE, the Court would conduct the ENE.”

Mixed bag

doni


Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply