1. The arguments that Handal presented in opposition to the motion for CE. It involved details that related to the Colorado ruling on the sole memory issue. Those issues involved Handal introducing patent 108 in his arguments in opposition to the Colorado ruling.

re-phrase...lol

1. The arguments that Handal presented in opposition to the motion for CE. It involved details that related to the Colorado ruling on the sole memory issue. Those issues involved Handal introducing patent 108 into his CE arguments for a consideration with regard to the Colorado ruling. The only consideration it got was lumping 774 and 108 into the judges ruling.

doni