Re: Pacer,Handal Request judicial Notice based on Federal rule 201(example Intel ) !
posted on
Oct 03, 2014 12:27PM
"I already posted in this board that usually the judge denies motion for sanction."
Yes, I read that contribution, however, as I see, the motion was not ruled on, the judge ruled in dismissing the case with prejudice.
The motion remains in limbo with the judges comments, that he would rule in favor of the sanctions.
As I see, e.Digital is responding with opposition to the remaining un-ruled motion....and the comments of the judge.
PLAINTIFF E.DIGITAL CORPORATION’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE; AND EXHIBITS 1-18 ATTACHED THERETO SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF ITS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATIONSYSTEMS, INC.’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
The case was dismissed with an un-resolved issue.
doni