Re: Pacer,e.DIGITAL v. Dropcam-Case transferred to Northern district of California !
posted on
Nov 06, 2014 10:23AM
The TX 7 & CO 19 were not in EDIG's backyard either.
I get your point, but a court is a court and I don't see it to be a deciding factor in Dropcam's favor.
What I don't get, is why they asked for it and why it was granted?
When we sued MOT, no motion to move the case was requested.
I hope this muscle play on GOOG's part bites them in the azz.
There must be reasons unknown to us why this happened.