Free
Message: Re: Pacer,e.DIGITAL v. Dropcam-Case transferred to Northern district of California !

The TX 7 & CO 19 were not in EDIG's backyard either.

I get your point, but a court is a court and I don't see it to be a deciding factor in Dropcam's favor.

What I don't get, is why they asked for it and why it was granted?

When we sued MOT, no motion to move the case was requested.

I hope this muscle play on GOOG's part bites them in the azz.

There must be reasons unknown to us why this happened.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply