"And is Huawei still on the hook for 108;"
“e.Digital brought suit against Woodman Labs, Inc. d/b/a GoPro (GoPro), Pantech Wireless, Inc. and Pantech Co. Ltd. (together, Pantech), Futurewei Technologies, Inc. and Huawei Device USA (together, Huawei), and Apple Inc. in the Southern District of California, asserting reexamined claim 33 and claims 2 and 5 of the '108 pa-tent. The court consolidated GoPro and Pantech's cases for discovery and claim construction purposes only. Based on the Colorado Court's previous construction, the defendants moved to apply collateral estoppel to the construction of the sole memory limitation in the '774 and '108 patents.”
I would say yes for the above listed and Huawei, as they were hoping a different outcome of 108 claims 2 and 5. Those terms can now go through the process.
This is what I have for the defendants listed above, SNDK missing?:
Apple Inc.; complaint 774,737,170; case settled
SanDisk Corporation....complaint 737, 774(item settled) ;
Pantech Wireless, Inc. aka Pantech NorthAmerica; complaint 774, 737, 108 ;
Fujifilm Corporation, complaint 774, 737, 170;
Woodman Labs complaint 737 ;
Huawei was a dispositive issue for e.Digital, however the appeal changes that situation as well, with regard to 108.
doni
