"How can we throw 445 at Apple also?'

By way of 108 claim 1, I see as the initial litmus test for claims construction in front of 445. If you think about it, that is what happened with 774 and 108…one sacrificed in front of the other.

This group we are dealing with now, regarding 108 claim 1, are making similar patent connections between 108 and 445...sman, if you remember, I considered this to be an issue resolved first prior to claims construction and that I had no interest in claims construction until it was resolved, IMO, it's now resolved.

IMO, the considerations of 108 and 774 now set a precedence for the same issues surrounding 108 and 445

We got a bonus with the appeal ruling.

doni