Pacer:EDIG v. Kingston - Settlement with motion to dismiss with prejudice
in response to
by
Message: What it takes to move things is--
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
E.DIGITAL CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 13-cv-2906-H-BLM
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
MOTION TO DISMISS WITH
PREJUDICE
[Doc. No. 45]
vs.
KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Defendant.
On December 5, 2013, Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation filed its complaint against
Defendant Kingston Technology Company, Inc. (Doc. No. 1.) On November 5, 2014,
the parties filed a notice of settlement. (Doc. No. 43.) On November 21, 2014, the
parties filed a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice all of the claims in the case. (Doc.
No. 45.)
The Court, for good cause shown, grants the parties’ joint motion and dismisses
the action with prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a).
The Court further orders:
1. The parties will bear their own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees
associated with the prosecution and defense of this action; and
2. The Court directs the clerk to close this case.
The remaining cases in this subset of the consolidated cases are 13-cv-2930-H
(BLM) and 13-cv-2943-H (BLM). The current low
1 number case in this subset of the
consolidated cases is 13-cv-2930-H (BLM).
DATED: November 21, 2014
______________________________
MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1
18 Recommendations
Loading...
Loading...
New Message
Please
login
to post a reply