Message: e.Digital Corporation v. New Dane ~ Pending Settlement
Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
P.O. Box 1450
Alexandria, VA 22313−1450
REPORT ON THE
FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
TRADEMARK
In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been filed in the U.S. District Court Southern District of California on the following: _X_ Patents or ___ Trademarks:
DOCKET NO.
3:13−cv−00785−MMA−BLM
DATE FILED
4/1/13
US District Court Southern District of California
San Diego, CA
PLAINTIFF
e.Digital Corporation
DEFENDANT
Apple Inc.
PATENT OR
TRADEMARK NO.
PATENT OR
TRADEMARK NO.
PATENT OR
TRADEMARK NO.
1. 5,842,170 6. 11.
2. 5,742,737 7. 12.
3. 5,491,774 8. 13.
4. 9. 14.
5. 10. 15.
In the above−entitled case, the following patents(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
In the above−entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgment issued:
DECISION/JUDGMENT
CLERK
W. Samuel Hamrick, Jr.
(BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE
P.O. Box 1450
Alexandria, VA 22313−1450
REPORT ON THE
FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
TRADEMARK
In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been filed in the U.S. District Court Southern District of California on the following: _X_ Patents or ___ Trademarks:
DOCKET NO.
3:13−cv−00785−MMA−BLM
DATE FILED
4/1/13
US District Court Southern District of California
San Diego, CA
PLAINTIFF
e.Digital Corporation
DEFENDANT
Apple Inc.
PATENT OR
TRADEMARK NO.
PATENT OR
TRADEMARK NO.
PATENT OR
TRADEMARK NO.
1. 5,842,170 6. 11.
2. 5,742,737 7. 12.
3. 5,491,774 8. 13.
4. 9. 14.
5. 10. 15.
In the above−entitled case, the following patents(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
In the above−entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgment issued:
DECISION/JUDGMENT
CLERK
W. Samuel Hamrick, Jr.
(BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On this day, Plaintiff e.Digital CORP. and Defendant APPLE INC.
announced to the Court that they have settled their respective claims for relief
asserted in this cause. The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion
that their request for dismissal should be granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims for relief asserted against
APPLE INC. by e.Digital CORP. herein are dismissed, with prejudice, and all
counterclaims for relief against e.Digital CORP. by APPLE INC. are dismissed without prejudice; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and
expenses shall be borne by each party incurring the same.
Signed this 18th day of December 2013.
announced to the Court that they have settled their respective claims for relief
asserted in this cause. The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion
that their request for dismissal should be granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims for relief asserted against
APPLE INC. by e.Digital CORP. herein are dismissed, with prejudice, and all
counterclaims for relief against e.Digital CORP. by APPLE INC. are dismissed without prejudice; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and
expenses shall be borne by each party incurring the same.
Signed this 18th day of December 2013.
19 Recommendations
Loading...
Loading...
New Message
Please
login
to post a reply