Seems to be reasonable.

Thing is, for the Micron issues, it's following an avenue that is, apparently, afforded to it through USPTO proceedings.

"Inter partes review is a new trial proceeding conducted at the Board to review the patentability of one or more claims in a patent only on a ground that could be raised under §§ 102 or 103, and only on the basis of prior art consisting of patents or printed publications."

The judge would have to identify with the issues offered in the exhibits rendered in the motion that the petitioner feels are justification for the review.

It would be more finding fault with the exhibits that would, IMO, deny the stay.

However, as noted:

The District Court has broad discretion to stay proceedings as an incident to its power to control its own docket.

I’d say the reverse is the same?

doni