While acknowledging that the Court would likely benefit from a review of the claim construction opinion, Judge Burke found that “the Central District will likely have issued its final Markman Order well before significant claim construction activity occurs in this case

As I consider, an IPR has to consider the opposit.

In the above, the court would benefit reflecting on an IPR opinion.

In e.Digitals case a IPR might reflect on a Markman order.

This, letgo, is where, IMO, Handal might build his confidence.

He has a claims construction favorable to e.Digital in the face of any IPR.

doni