"It seems they are now atempting to argue with the USPTO the same points just conceeded in the CC hearing. IMHO"

----------------------------------------------

I haven't read the USPTO petition yet.

However , from the surface, they are arguing prior art issues that they consider existed prior to the 108 patent for claim 1.

For the CC hearing, the judge ruled on the technical considerations of claim 1 to be valid. We as investors have been right on that account, where the defendant is not challenging that consideration....Thing is, we have no idea of the prior art consideration.

sman you might look into the previous petition filed that was approved by the USPTO...subsequently terminated when Intel settled.

doni