Re: 2-13-14
in response to
by
posted on
Feb 10, 2015 03:14PM
Pantech had *5,839,108*, *5,742,737*, *5,491,774* asserted.
09/16/2013 | 48 | STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT. The Court enters this Stipulated Partial Judgment of Non-Infringement in favor of Pantech on e.Digital's claim for infringement of claims 33 and 34 of the '774 patent, claims 2 and 5 of the '108 patent, and any other claims depending therefrom. (Dkt# 10). Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 9/16/2013.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef) (Entered: 09/16/2013) |
737 need be settled, will 108 be re-asserted post appeal ruling as a result of appeal reversal, 108 disconnected from 774 ?
----------------------------------------
Huawei had *5,742,737*, *5,491,774*, *5,839,108*, *5,842,170* asserted.
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
TERMINATED: 05/23/2013
Futurewei Technologies, Inc.
doing business as
Huawei Technologies (USA)
Huawei Device USA, Inc.
10/07/2013 | 73 |
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT. The Court hereby enters this Final Judgment as follows: a) Judgment in favor of Huawei on e.Digital's claims for infringement of claims 33 and 34 of the '774 patent, claims 2 and 5 of the '108 patent, and any other claims depending therefrom (Dkt# 1) as a result of the application of the Collateral Estoppel Order. b) Dismissal with prejudice of e.Digital's claims of patent infringement with respect to the '170 and '737 patents as asserted in the Complaint against the remaining defendants, Futurewei Technologies, Inc. and, Huawei Device USA, Inc. c) Dismissal with prejudice of Futurewei Technologies, Inc. and Huawei Device USA, Inc. counterclaims asserted in their June 12, 2013 answers as to the '170 and '737 patents only. (Dkt# 25, 27). d) Dismissal with prejudice as to the Parties claims and counterclaims arising under the '737 and '170 patents. Each Party shall bear its own costs and fees. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 10/7/2013.(aef) (Entered: 10/07/2013) |
Futurewei Technologies, Inc. and, Huawei Device USA, Inc. as it looks, must clear up 108 and 774 post appeal as the "remaining defendants." 774 is a given
----------------------------------------
Sandisk had *5,742,737*, *5,491,774* asserted.
10/23/2013 | 54 | Joint MOTION to Dismiss Claims and Counterclaims Re: '774 Patent Only by e.Digital Corporation. (Hedrick, Gabriel)(aef). (Entered: 10/23/2013) |
10/25/2013 | 55 | ORDER Granting 54 Joint Motion Re: Voluntary Dismissal of Claims and Counterclaims as to the '774 Patent Only. It is hereby ordered: e.Digital's claims of infringement of the 774 patent only are dismissed with prejudice; SanDisk's counterclaims as to the 774 patent only are dismissed without prejudice; and Each side shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs, and waive any recovery of same, in connection with the dismissals herein only. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 10/25/2013. (jao) (Entered: 10/25/2013) |
SNDK must clear up 737
-----------------------------------------------
GoPro had *5,742,737* asserted
-----------------------------------------------
doni