Re: I recall a bit more:
in response to
by
posted on
Feb 19, 2015 07:01PM
"The judge pondered a bit, looked at her paperwork some then asked Micron "Isn't 108 a seperate and different patent than 445? The Micron atty admitted it was, and the judge then asked why he was trying to insert 445's definition into 108....As Mr. Handal stated "he had no answer"
There yuou go baby ...you got it..
So does the judge...SHE GOT THIS STUFF DOWN!!!!!
This is exactly, IMO, what will happen with the IPR petition....
doni