"Remembering a post where you emplasised ''logical'' "

Over the years, many....

emit..it's time to wait for the details to unfold.

1. Statutory law should end the Micron IPR....otherwise, why have the laws.

2. If the laws are ignoired and the 12-31-14 petition date stays in effect for Micron, e.Digital then responds to the preliminary issues of Micron where the PTAB then(3 months) make up their mind to docket the case or not.

I now see a problem here, will the PTAB respond to e.Digitals motion for rehearing, or will it stall waiting for e.Digitals response due 4-29-15 based on the recently ordered 12-31-14 petition date????

3. If the case is docketed.....the challenge will be general pointers as described in prior art ....compared to logical relationships/links as detailed within e.Digitals scope of patent then detailed into claim terms as a broadest meaning. In that, "logical" is the key word of differentiation of prior art....where a lot rides on that difference.

e.Digital can manage a whole system with logical relationships/links as compared to prior art managing portions of a system with pointers. With that, e.Digital is not tied to having to manage a whole system logically and can implement hybrid variations. The patent was approved based on these factors.....and a broadest meaning was approved over citation prior art "pointer' details.

doni