trying to out puzzle Handal and the court....as both need to unfold the defendants consideration.

New defense....resorting to the chicken (Flashback?) and the egg (108?) scenario (whichever fits where).....where I gather, 774 (flashback/108) does not fit in the considered scenario.

As I see the puzzle...

Flashback <------>774 <------->108

Flashback is separated by 774 from 108, where 774 and 108 are separate entities confirmed by the recent CE appeal.

lol

doni