Re: IPR Preliminary Response filed prior art Katayama and Mills
in response to
by
posted on
Apr 30, 2015 07:46AM
1. Katayama does not disclose “moving the new data segment
from the cache memory to the next available space within
primary memory.”…………………………………………….31
2. Katayama does not disclose “storing the data segments to
primary memory in a manner consistent with an industry
standard data storage format while retaining linking between
data segments created in previous steps.”…………………….34
3. Mills discloses almost none of the elements of claim 1 of the
’108 patent……………………………………………………35
a. Mills does not disclose “creating the primary memory
from a non-volatile, long-term storage medium” as
contemplated by the inventors…………………………36
b. Mills does not disclose “storing the data segments to
primary memory in a manner consistent with an industry
standard data storage format while retaining linking
between data segments created in the previous
steps.”………………………………………………….38
C. Petitioners fail to offer any meaningful analysis as to why the
combination of Katayama and Mills would have been obvious to one
of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention……………...41
doni