OF COURSE I HAD NO DEFINITIVE IDEA MICRON WOULD SETTLE BUT IN THAT COURTROOM MR. KAY WAS ON THE DEFENSIVE THE ENTIRE TIME, BLOVIATED AT EVERY TURN AND WAS QUITE FORCEFULLY QUESTIONED AND EVEN PUT DOWN BY JUDGE HUFF.

AFTER LEAVING THERE AND THEN REPORTING HERE I FELT MICRON HAD "TACITLY" ADMITTED IT WAS INFRINGING JUST THE WAY THE EVENTS IN THE COURTROOM WENT AND THE ATTITUDE HE SHOWED WHEN HE STATED MICRON'S DEFENSE WOULD PRIMARILY BE ON "INTENT", LEAVING OUT ANY MENTION OF DENYING ANY INFRINGEMENT WHATSOEVER.

IN ANY EVENT IT DOES SEEM MICRON WANTED NO PART OF A TRIAL, SETTLED, AND BY THAT SETTLEMENT ADMITTED IT HAD INFRINGED......IMO

I JUST HOPE, AS DONI DOES, AND AS I HAVE STATED MR. HANDAL IS NOT LETTING THIS ONE GET AWAY LIKE THE SAMSUNG FIASCO...

ALSO, DONI, JUST WHAT IS YOUR OPINION ON THE MICROSEMI "IPR"? IF MICRON SETTLED IT SEEMS TO ME THE "IPR" BECOMES SOMEWHAT MOOT?