It isn't really a matter of being a troll, it is a matter of our tech being unique, usefull and in demand. How much should we charge for our tech? Whatever the market will bear of course.

It is interesting to me that on the one hand Edig's tech is "obvious" in light of prior art, and on the other it is "complex" enough to be unique but misundstood or by Judges or otherwise obfuscated by defendant lawyering. I guess it is just a matter of throwing the kitchen sink against the wall.

Skreal