Handal rolled the dice...

The blind side of the claims construction had a perfect out come... that could have ended up being moot had 108 not been released from the CE ruling.

He threw the dice at both CE and pressing 108 in new cases at the same time, where the timing of outcome was magnificent between the two.

108 and 774 are different patents having a 180 degree approach to a similarity of detail....and that's that.

Where this time, the circuit judge was not uniformed / mislead (whatever one feels to call it) of the details.

Where , in my following the details of the initial IPR's, the initial pleadings had no, worth.

The IP sited and considered prior, cannot do what e.Digital patented under ONE consideration...memory reclamation, memory ware leveling, and data management.

For the status qou ...flash memory reclamation, and data management, are two separate and distinct details of management....that is what the industry is built around ... unless it's infringing e.Digitals IP.

I say the whole industry has adopted e.Digital methods...knowingly (direct infringement) and unknowingly (indirect infringement).

Letgo, I'm as excited as you.....SNDK calling it a day is fantastic!

doni