With that there will be a patent system of value or there will be no patent system.

Let the PTO govern technical issues that might be more than an opinion for claims construction.

Whatever prior art technical issues a patent is challenged on should be straightened out first.

Let the IP owner get the added benefit of not having valuable IP life substantially depleted in civil procedures and proposed bogus challenges....Challenges considered to do nothing more than deplete IP life....without any repercussions to the challenger.

EAT TIME IS THE NAME OF THE GAME.

An IPR up front , if IPRs are to exist ....will eliminate some of the civil shenanigans of depleting IP life.

doni