Re: Infringement Trial Edig/Dropcam/ ted/joe
in response to
by
posted on
Aug 10, 2015 11:15AM
The past has been horrible for EDIG/us on many fronts, with the most recent "pain" in CO re: 2010.
From the Aug 22, 2013 PR...
In connection with its continuing effort to bring potential infringers in line with the Company's licensing programs, e.Digital filed several law suits in the Federal Court in and for the Southern District of California. Many of the defendants filed a joint motion requesting the judge to prevent the Company from relitigating the meaning of certain terms of the Company’s US Patent No. 5,491,774 (“the ’774 patent”) as defined by the judge in the Company's 2010 Colorado litigation. The Company's law firm, Handal & Associates, opposed the motion on various grounds, not the least of which is that the Colorado court was unable to consider subsequent re-examination proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office related to the patent that resulted in modified claim language and which would have provided guidance to the Court as to the proper interpretation of the claims.
>>>So, 5 years ago this month we got the shaft in CO, but it was not over. Thru the brilliant work of the Handal Team, including the CE appeal then successfull CC rulings, we now have this Nunchi item re: Dropcam, awaiting a decision.
The rules on this site say that I cannot hype nor pump, so I'll predict, strictly IMO, the rule of law, the judges opinion, will be in e.Digital's favor once again.
I feel very confident in Nunally and Handal, to make a difference this go round.
Here's hoping for you Teddy!!!