Re: golden
in response to
by
posted on
Sep 20, 2015 11:58AM
Yes, I read the HOURLY.
That would have been the day of the hearing, we are a month away from that.
Planks consideration is the day after the transcription is actually filed and available...on the 17th.
Did Plank wait from 8-3-15 this long to give us considerations ?
I have nothing against PLANK, very keen to history of events, as she recently corrected me.
But this? Its a transcript of the
73 |
|
Claims Construction / Markman Hearing |
Full docket text for document 73:
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Hon. Jon S. Tigar: Markman Hearing held on 8/3/2015. Court Reporter Name Debra Pas. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 8/3/2015)
There's no formal ruling the day of the hearing...If the court has ruled in the interim and included it in the transcript we are really looking at a system that is a sham.
doni