108 patent disclosed a differentinvention. Further, the Federal Circuit specifically noted that two figures clearly depicted RAM and therefore, the ‘108 patent requires a new claim construction including whether the sole memory limitation applies or not.
a “continuation-in-part, for instance,
may disclose new matter
http://tsircoulaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Collateral-Estoppel-When-is-the-Second-Proceeding-Stuck-With-the-Claim-Construction-of-a-First-Proceeding.pdf
