sman...pay attention to the highlights noted, if you are reviewing petition vs response.

A. Overview of the Jolliff and Jager References ........................................................... 9

1. Jolliff ........................................................................................................................ 9

2. Jager ....................................................................................................................... 12

B. Petitioners fail to meet their burden of showing a likelihood of success in

proving that Jolliff in view of Jager renders the ’522 patent claims obvious. ............... 16

1. Petitioners have not met their burden of showing a reasonable likelihood

of success in demonstrating that either Jolliff or Jager disclose “a memory

which stores social templates, each social template corresponding to a

unique social signature”/“constructing a social signature using sensor data

sensed by a sensor set”.............................................................................................. 17

2. Petitioners have not met their burden of showing a reasonable likelihood

they will prevail in demonstrating that Jolliff discloses “creates a detected

social signature from the received sensor data” or “constructing a social

signature using sensor data sensed by a sensor set”............................................. 24

3. Petitioners have not met their burden of showing a reasonable likelihood

of success in demonstrating that either Jolliff or Jager disclose “each social

template being selectable to provide, for each level of the predetermined

social hierarchy, a corresponding differing amount of information.”........................ 27

VI. PETITIONERS FAIL TO OFFER ANY MEANINGFUL ANALYSIS

AS TO WHY THE COMBINATION OF JOLLIFF AND JAGER WOULD

HAVE BEEN OBVIOUS TO ONE OF ORDINARY SKILL IN THE ART

AT THE TIME OF THE INVENTION. .................................................................