From Markman:"The Company’s law firm, Handal & Associates, asserted more than 50 claims from six patents against DropCam, resulting in a number of disputes over the meaning of specific terms in the patents. We believe the Court’s ruling is favorable to e.Digital and enhances the ability to enforce the Company’s patents against infringers.." From IPR institution: Claims 1,3,6,17,21,24,25..petitioner challenged and may prevail. Seems to me there ought to be something in the other 43 claims that are favorable to Edig??