Free
Message: Pacer - e.DIGITAL v. Dropcam --- Schedueling order
Icon president CES
1
Jan 05, 2016 08:57AM
2
Jan 05, 2016 08:59AM
1
Jan 05, 2016 09:02AM
2
Jan 05, 2016 09:05AM

Jan 05, 2016 09:08AM
1
Jan 05, 2016 11:39AM

Jan 05, 2016 12:18PM

Jan 05, 2016 02:08PM
5
Jan 05, 2016 02:17PM
4
Jan 05, 2016 02:18PM
1
Jan 05, 2016 03:49PM
1
Jan 05, 2016 04:00PM
4
Jan 05, 2016 04:17PM
4
Jan 05, 2016 04:43PM
1
Jan 05, 2016 07:23PM
3
Jan 06, 2016 08:32AM
1
Jan 07, 2016 01:46AM
1
Jan 07, 2016 10:24AM

E.DIGITAL CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

DROPCAM, INC.,

Defendant

SCHEDULING ORDER

SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10: Event

Deadline

Deadline to amend the pleadings1

1/13/2016

Designation of expert witnesses (party with burden of proof)

4/15/2016

Fact discovery cut-off

4/30/2016

Supplemental designation of expert witnesses (party without burden of proof)

4/30/2016

Mediation deadline

5/6/2016

Opening expert reports

6/10/2016

Rebuttal expert reports

7/8/2016

Expert discovery cut-off

8/19/2016

Deadline to file dispositive motions

9/9/2016

Pretrial conference statement due

12/6/2016

Pretrial conference

12/16/2016 at 2:00 p.m.

Trial

1/9/2017 at 8:30 a.m.

Estimate of trial length (in days)

8

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party-controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause to grant a continuance.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 6, 2016

___________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

1
Jan 18, 2016 05:52PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply