"Also, I wonder if this judge wanted: the focus to be completely shifted to the Northern District?"

We wait on a motion to stay regarding the Drop-Cam/NEST case as well...

IMO, show down between the USPTO and the civil system.

Someone, @ some point....must be definitive. Passing the buck must end.

Has the USPTO granted patents that are misleading? Three judges employed by the USPTO will make a determination regarding that consideration.

And I do not care how claims are realized @ the civil level or the USPTO level ...Broad or less broad ?

Are the patents novel-ly employed, or are they not? I say they are, because of prior IP...Mainly, 108 and the way data is detailed in fast fashion.

This whole process has turned into one big joke...

Apple being found dis-positive in an initial case with damages of 300 million...then appeals that decision... only to be found dis-positive yet again for 600 million in damages willfully.

No one goes to jail is the problem... plain and simple.

Hold corporate executives liable and watch the thievery go away. Until that changes the system will advance on such issues as the newly devised AIA creating more confusion than ever.

doni