What e.Digital has going for it that the PTAB must recognize and, we as investors must recognize...:

Google, in principle, has no IP that relates to e.Digitals teachings and relies on the prior IP of others.

A recipe of the collective Prior art has not been recognized by the USPTO...under patent or provisional patent....it has been rejected.

There is a prior positive claims construction ruling to e.Digial that can not be denied.

There are subsequent e.Digital published patents that realize possible ambiguity of the former patents that are not subject to the current IPR process, that may lend teaching to less ambiguity to the patents under pressure.

There has been cross examination of a professional witness, where the considerations of that witness were re-considered by the witness....to be positive to e.Digital.

The prior art used in this process for an IPR is now subject to the same pressured considerations that e.Digital IP is subject to....do or die....Where the owners of that prior art IP have absolutely no control over the fait of their property.

Fred pulled the trigger, e.Digital did not motion for any amendments....where IMVHO, Handal spelled out to Fred the consequences....not to amend.

The IPR process itself is now currently subject to rulings by higher authorities, which may or may not reflect positively on e.Digitals IPR pressures....

We have, as investors, a six month wait to see if we survive.

doni