rephrase....

RE: PTAB's scheduling order

A. DUE DATES
This order sets due dates for the parties to take action after institution
of the proceeding. The parties may stipulate to different dates for DUE
DATES 1 through 5 (earlier or later, but no later than DUE DATE 6). A
notice of the stipulation, specifically identifying the changed due dates, must
be promptly filed. The parties may not stipulate to an extension of DUE
DATES 6 and 7.

IPR2015-01470
Patent 8,311,522 B1
7
DUE DATE APPENDIX
INITIAL CONFERENCE CALL .............................................. Upon Request

DUE DATE 1 ......................................................................... March 23, 2016
Patent owner’s response to the petition
Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent

DUE DATE 2 ............................................................................ June 23, 2016...change balance to July 22, 2016
Petitioner’s reply to patent owner’s response to petition
(strike) Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend

DUE DATE 3 ............................................................................. July 25, 2016
(strike) Patent owner’s reply to petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend

DUE DATE 4 ........................................................................ August 15, 2016
Motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness
Motion to exclude evidence
Request for oral argument

DUE DATE 5 ........................................................................ August 29, 2016
Response to observation
Opposition to motion to exclude

DUE DATE 6 .................................................................... September 6, 2016
Reply to opposition to motion to exclude

DUE DATE 7 .................................................................. September 20, 2016
Oral argument (if requested)
it's going to be a response to the PTABs comments in the decision to institute...

=========================================================

Recent changes requested

Specifically, Petitioners and Patent Owner have agreed to modify Due Dates 2 and 3 as follows:

Modified DUE DATE 2..............................June 23, 2016 now July 22, 2016

Petitioner’s reply to patent owner’s response to petition

(strike) Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend

Modified DUE DATE 3 ............................................................July 25, 2016

(strike) Patent owner’s reply to petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend

=========================================================

BLR....basically, e.Digital did not motion to amend its patent as noted above...With that, the response by petitioner was stricken and the owners response to the response for that issue was stricken.....They moved up the petitioner balance a smidge to meet a date that e.Digital subsequently does not need , other than that not much can kicking.

doni