For BRI vs ordinary meaning on claims I'm off to the side on the argument.

As of now 522 is not subject to Claims construction per PTAB comments...not yet anyway...and this is the mother ship.

It is noted in e.Digitals 2nd response that the other 4 patents are considered to be subject to claims construction, however, I've not read anything on the other IPR dockets except for verbatim issues noted on the 522 docket....with that, I guess we'll never now what is taking place with the other dockets.

The main argument for 522 by petitioner is that Robarts / Miluzzo is a combination that one of ordinary skill will obviously consider together to nullify e.Digital issue.

They're not splitting hairs over claims construction....yet...and it looks like its not going there.

From my prospective, they are splitting hairs over specification type issues....and the specifications of prior art.

doni